Friday, July 01, 2005

Ex Libris: The Cambridge History of English and American Literatures



In 18 vols., online courtesy to Bartleby.com, advertises:


http://www.bartleby.com/cambridge/


"Considered the most important work of literary history and criticism ever published, the Cambridge History contains over 303 chapters and 11,000 pages, with essay topics ranging from poetry, fiction, drama and essays to history, theology and political writing. The set encompasses a wide selection of writing on orators, humorists, poets, newspaper columnists, religious leaders, economists, Native Americans, song writers, and even non-English writing, such as Yiddish and Creole."


And, one hopes, Latin. For while the multi-ethnic chic sub-classical liberal may delight at the thought of how Yiddish, Creole, Gullah, Ebonics, or Zuni might have contributed to Our National Literature, the fact remains that 90% at least of the first two volumes of this patently hijacked Anglo-Latinity and a fair fraction of the next few, should be (and to some extent are, oddly enough) devoted to Latin.



In this Ex Libris series, we will be examining the Majestic-12 or so volumes of the CHEAL chapter by chapter, volume by volume, sometimes line by line, as it traces the true history of Our People. We won't take very long at it, for most of The Truth is tucked away in about 1% the majestic 18 volumes, which must warm the Barbarian Heart and, if he remembers he has one, Soul. More generally, Ex Libris will delve, from time to time, into the books written about us by the Enemy. By Academics, by Conservatives, by Liberals, Socialists if they even bother, by our Pogo-challenged selves, when we forget our own past or worse never bother to check the Truth of what we are told.


As a preview of the feast of bilingualism and multiform ethnicity that lies before us, the first two volumes cover a half millenium or so each, and the remaining 16 volumes what Noam Chomsky has so conveniently for us denominated the last 500 years. English, as if cultures had to do with languages (race) and territories, rather than religions or civilizations, gamely starts 500 years along into the History of Britain. Thus we have the inconvenient fact that the first 500 years of Roman Civilization, and with it the first 400 years of Christian culture in Britain, must be more or less chucked altogether, Constantine of York notwithstanding, so we can wait for the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, to show up with their beloved Aryan gene-pool and we can finally have a Civilization capable of speech, if not right off of writing. Not to be de-terred, Ex Libris will consider what the saeson has to say about the populi ab origines, bless his little Freia-worshiping heart.


In truth, we don't quite get the whole English-speaking Christian act together until Anno 600 or so, since the Saxon shows up in 450, but doesn't bother to get Christianized for 150 years. Even so, we still have a millenium to cover when mixing English + Christian is not the guaranteed [latish Norman word, that], um, warranted start of a nasty brawl, and we only have two volumes to do it. The first volume is nice enough. One can hardly talk about Anglo-Saxons without talking about Latin, since those who wrote Saxon beyond a few scratchings on rocks here and there were, almost to the man, (1) Christians, hence oddly enough involved with the Church; (2) Latinate, since they didn't write with runes; (3) interested in making everyone in sight Latinate and Christian, to the extent it seemed appropriate to them. In short, they were as much us (Christian, Civilized, culturally Roman, living in or coming from, Britain), as us ever gets these days.


We are instructed, sensibly enough, that Anglo-Saxon means "a Saxon living in England", much as West Indian, American Indian, and East Indian all mean different peoples. The myth has been gotten up that Anglo + Saxon means a fusion of the Angles and Saxon, but it isn't so. This usage of the word was taken up after the Anglo-Latins had ceased to be even a hidden and proscribed tradition, and their scholars (such as the Non-Juror Hickes), had passed on the baton, if not precisely the racial barre sinistre to the Anglo-Saxon race however you care to construe it.


The Angles live one place, have their own kingdoms, and the Saxons live another place, have their own dialect, their own kings. Ditto Jutes. We also learn that "Old English" is a term invented by Prussian philologists in the 19th century, in analogy to Middle English and Modern English and the same terminology applied to other Germanic languages. But that is Them, this is Us, so we will eschew "Old English" and use it in the sense everyone not over-educated does, for any archaic ("early modern") dialect that looks funny.


We will learn, in the next few articles, that Our National Literature (in the high culture sense of more than deeds, chronicles, or a couple laws about scratching peoples eyes out) consists, in this period, mostly of:


  1. The works of British (Welsh) authors in Latin, mainly Gildas and his school.


    Insert here some "hisperic" stuff that might have happened on British soil. It is hard to separate out the individual achievements of insular Christians in their native Roman culture and Civilization back when ut unum sint was not a subjunctive contrary to fact.

  2. The works of monks in the Irish mission to Northumbria.

  3. The Greek (!) school of the Kentish mission, led by a Turkish (natch), Theodore of Tarsus, and an African Archbishop, Adrian, from the eastern, Greek-speaking portion of Roman Africa, Libya.

  4. The contents of one book, the Exeter book, in (anachronistically Anglo-) Saxon.

  5. Aldhelm, and his school

  6. Alcuin, who gets the Carolingian Re-Nascence going

  7. Do we get to count Eriugena?


  8. All of which is pretty much destroyed by Vikings so we hit the reset button and start over with:

  9. Translations by Alfred, etc.

  10. more stuff for another post.



Not bad: it's a start. Greek, Latin, and teach the Rune-boys a thing or two. Sort of what we are up against today, come to think of it. And what little civilization we have we import from Asia Minor and Libya, with help from the monks. Sounds like the start of a plan to me.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Test Comment

December 05, 2005 10:50 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home